Are Fetal Heartbeat Laws Constitutional? (and the History of Roe v. Wade) -- Real Law Review
10,216⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! https://legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
Can states circumvent Roe v. Wade? Is Roe still good law? What will happen in the Supreme Court?
Check out Tab for a Cause: https://tab.gladly.io/legaleagle
Several states have signed or enacted “fetal heartbeat bills” that ban abortion as soon as electrical activity is detected within the fetus. Doctors say that this activity can occur as soon as six weeks after fertilization. Some advocates call this a complete ban on abortions in disguise.
If you ask most people about abortion rights they can probably name one case: Roe v. Wade. But in the modern era, the more important case is Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Both Roe and Casey are the progeny of another case called Griswold v. Connecticut which first recognized a right to privacy.
Regardless of which side of the aisle you sit, it’s important to know the constitutional underpinnings of the current jurisprudence. Supreme Court case law can change. Often it needs to. In some ways it’s inevitable. So let’s talk about how things are likely to change in the wake of the fetal heartbeat bills.
(Thanks to Tab for a Cause for sponsoring this video)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.
And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!
Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.
★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts: https://goo.gl/hw9vcE
Laws Broken: https://goo.gl/PJw3vK
Law 101: https://goo.gl/rrzFw3
Real Law Review: https://goo.gl/NHUoqc
All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
========================================================
★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ https://twitter.com/legaleagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ https://www.facebook.com/legaleaglereacts
★ Stella’s Insta: https://www.instagram.com/stellathelegalbeagle
Other Videos By LegalEagle
Other Statistics
Heartbeat Statistics For LegalEagle
At this time, LegalEagle has 273,990 views for Heartbeat spread across 1 video. His channel published less than an hour of Heartbeat content, making up less than 0.33% of the total overall content on LegalEagle's YouTube channel.