The Problem With Talking To People

Channel:
Subscribers:
4,560,000
Published on ● Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjHcD3JPrnY



Duration: 11:32
428,775 views
22,417


Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: https://masterworks.art/vsauce2

Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more. See important Masterworks disclosures: http://masterworks.io/cd

If you can’t trust yourself, then who can you trust? Well… everyone and no one. The paradox of self-reporting in all manners of data collection, from basic census information to detailed stats about crime, makes it difficult for us to understand the problems we need to solve. Is it best to design experiments and carefully cull datasets to observe the information we need? Should we rely solely on testimony directly from people involved, and then trust that their answers are correct? Is the right answer a blend of the two?

The truth is that they all have serious problems that lead us down the wrong path for making sense of social behavior. But if they’re all awful, how can it possibly be useful to employ every strategy together?

To understand crime, we need to measure crime. To measure crime, we need to understand people. And all of it relies on a deep knowledge of individuals who employ malevolence, who are victims of flawed and biased systems, or who are just plain wrong in good faith.

In a way, it’s hopeless -- but in the morass of human social behavior, we manage to progress.

*** ADDITIONAL READING ***

“Survey of Prison and Jail Inmates: Background and Method,” Peterson, Chaiken, Ebener, Honig (1982): https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N1635.html

“Extent of Unrecorded Juvenile Delinquency: Tentative Conclusions,” Short and Nye (1959): https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol49/iss4/2/

“Measurement Error in Self-Reported Health Variables,” Butler, Burkhauser, Mitchell and Pincus (1987): https://www.jstor.org/stable/1935959

“A Comparison of Participant Observation and Survey Data,” Vidich and Shapiro (1955): https://www.jstor.org/stable/2088196

“Bias in Interviewing in Studies of Opinions, Attitudes, and Consumer Wants,” Hart (1948): https://www.jstor.org/stable/3143052

“Deception in Social Research I: Kinds of Deception and the Wrongs They May Involve.” Sieber (1982): https://www.jstor.org/stable/3564511

“Measuring bias in self-reported data,” Rosenman, Tennekoon, Hill (2011): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4224297/

*** LINKS ***

Vsauce2:
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@vsaucetwo
Twitter: https://twitter.com/VsauceTwo
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/VsauceTwo
Talk Vsauce2 in The Create Unknown Discord: https://discord.gg/tcu
Vsauce2 on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/vsauce2/

Hosted and Produced by Kevin Lieber
Instagram: https://instagram.com/kevlieber
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kevinlieber
Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/thecreateunknown

Research and Writing by Matthew Tabor
https://twitter.com/TaborTCU

Editing by John Swan
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJuSltoYKrAUKnbYO5EMZ2A

Huge Thanks To Paula Lieber
https://www.etsy.com/shop/Craftality

Vsauce's Curiosity Box: https://www.curiositybox.com/

#education #vsauce #crime







Tags:
vsauce
vsauce2
vsause
vsause2
self-report
self-report measures
self reporting techniques
crime data
crime data analysis
crime data analyst
talking to people
self improvement
self improvement motivation
self improvement books
jordan peterson
math crimes
math to solve crime
math crime show
crime documentary
crime documentary 2022
crime analysis
analyzing criminal behavior
analyzing criminals
analyzing crime
what is crime
vsauce2 crime
vsauce2 math crime